Peace be upon you, esteemed teacher.
Why, in one passage of Ziyārat Jāmiʿa al-Kabīra, are the Infallible Imams described as “اَفَلا ینظُرونَ اِلَى الاِبِلِ کیفَ خُلِقَت * اِلَى السَّماءِ کیفَ رُفِعَت * اِلَى الجِبالِ کیفَ نُصِبَت * اِلَى الاَرضِ کیفَ سُطِحَت”?
As we know, the literal meaning of “pillar” is a support or column. The most fundamental support of anything is called its pillar, and if that pillar collapses, the thing itself is destroyed. Prayer, for example, has five pillars, and it is said that if even one of them is deliberately or inadvertently omitted, the prayer is invalid.
My question is this: In what sense does the existence of tawḥīd—the oneness of God—depend on something or someone (the Infallibles, peace be upon them), such that their absence would endanger or undermine the attainment of tawḥīd, or belief and knowledge of it? Secondly, God’s exalted essence is infinite, whereas the Infallibles, peace be upon them, are finite in comparison with the Divine.
Given all this, why are the Infallibles, peace be upon them, referred to as the pillars of tawḥīd? Does this mean that without belief in them, it is impossible to attain any degree of tawḥīd? Or what is meant?
If we wish—God forbid—to speak of attaining tawḥīd without taking the Infallibles into account, I will offer just one example: reflecting on the order of creation can lead a person towards tawḥīd and to its recognition—not necessarily practical tawḥīd, but at least theoretical tawḥīd. The Qur’an points to this in many places, including:
«* و* و* و» (Sūrat al-Ghāshiya, 17–20)
Reflection on creation, then, offers powerful guidance towards the oneness and power of God.
I would be grateful for your guidance.
َّهِ الرَّحْمنِ الرَّحيمِ