Setting aside what philosophers have written, and without approaching the question through their ideas:
When we say «الله لیس کمثله شیء», can we also say «الله لیس کمثله وجود» and that Allah is the Necessary Existent?
#Answer2881
If we wish to describe the Essence of the Real as existence, we must observe the considerations involved in defining and describing it. Some of these are as follows:
فربنا تبارک و تعالى لا شبه له و لا ضد و لا ند و لا کیف و لا نهایه
We know that just as the Essence of the Real has no likeness or counterpart, it also has no opposite. Every existent that comes into being is preceded by nonexistence; thus, the existence of every existent can be compared with its opposite, which is nonexistence. But the existence of the Essence of the Real has no opposite or counterpart. The Essence of the Real admits no unity of existence with other existents; it is far too exalted, pure and transcendent for that.
Thus, we can understand that the Essence of the Real is «لیس کمثله شیء» and, by extension, «لیس کمثله وجود». Of course, we must not forget that the Essence of the Real—the existence of the Real—is beyond description.