Skip to content

notifications_active Weekly Meshkat-e Noor Session: Thursdays at 20:30 at Haj Reza Mosque

languageEN
login Login
Question No. 3368 2 November 2023 Official answer by Master Ali Saei (Abdullah Meshkat) verified Content level: Intermediate

Does Clerical Attire Have Inherent Sanctity?

Primary reference: See the answer text 38 views 23 explanatory notes and annotations
Verified answer Documented and evidence-based
Dear questioner, Master Ali Saei
Tracking code: #Q-3368

#Addendum

Some people regard clerical dress as inherently sacred and, in a partisan way, defend its sanctity as something customary and acquired, subject to change according to differing circumstances. Could the argument below establish that this dress is sacred in itself?

Please also analyse the following story, if its chain of transmission is sound.

**Pharaoh’s Jester**

There was a jester at Pharaoh’s court whose role was to mock others, especially Moses—peace be upon him—and those around him. One day, Moses—peace be upon him—and his brother Aaron came to the palace gates to guide Pharaoh. The jester came to the door and asked who they were and what they wanted. They replied that they were God’s messengers, Moses and Aaron. They carried a staff, wore a cloak, and had caps on their heads. The jester hurried into the palace, put on clothes resembling theirs, and went before Pharaoh. Pharaoh laughed heartily and asked him, “What are you wearing?” He replied, “These are Moses’ clothes. He has just come to your palace, claiming to be a prophet and to guide people.”

Pharaoh ordered that they be admitted. They showed him their miracle and warned him of divine punishment, but Pharaoh would not heed their heavenly summons, and matters came to divine punishment. It came on the day Moses—peace be upon him—parted the sea by God’s permission and crossed it. When Pharaoh’s army entered the water, divine punishment overtook them and they all drowned. Only one of them survived: Pharaoh’s jester. Moses—peace be upon him—was astonished that he had survived and asked God why. The reply came: “Moses, I do not punish someone who has made himself resemble My friend.”¹

1. *Anwār al-Nuʿmāniyya*.

The essence and first answer at a glance (60-word summary)

The report about Pharaoh’s jester is not sound in its chain of transmission, and even if it were, it would not establish that clerical attire is inherently sacred. Those who merely pose as scholars are thieves of the mantle of prophethood and imamate; their appearance should not be allowed to deceive. God Most High said: “Whoever’s outward appearance is more refined than their inward character is My enemy.”

Answer by Master Ali Saei (Abdullah Meshkat)

Teacher and researcher in the intellectual tradition of wisdom and the Ahl al-Bayt | Soroush Bamdadān Cultural Center

I have not found the report cited above in Shi‘i sources. Even if we accept it as authentic, it does not absolve those who merely pose as scholars. The difference between a clown and a false scholar is that the clown’s role is plain to everyone: he is known as a clown, and his sole purpose is to make people laugh. But people trust the false scholar and regard him as a representative of religion; any mistake he makes can deal a devastating blow to their beliefs.

In truth, false scholars are thieves who steal the mantle of prophethood, imamate and wilayah!

و عن رسول الله ص عن الله تعالى أوحى الله تعالى إلى موسى یا موسى من کان ظاهره أزین من باطنه فهو عدوی حقا و من کان ظاهره و باطنه سواء فهو مؤمن حقا و من کان باطنه أزین من ظاهره فهو ولیی حقا
جامع الأخبار (للشعیری)، ص: 185

God Most High said: “Whoever’s outward appearance is more adorned than his inward reality is truly My enemy. Whoever’s outward and inward are alike is a true believer. And whoever’s inward reality is more adorned than his outward appearance is truly My friend.”

ما أقبح بالإنسان ظاهرا موافقا و باطنا منافقا
عیون الحکم و المواعظ (للیثی)، ص: 477

How ugly it is for a person to be agreeable on the outside and hypocritical within!

و قال ص رأیت لیله أسری بی قوما تقرض شفاههم بمقاریض من نار کلما قرضت ردت فقلت یا جبرئیل من هؤلاء فقال خطباء أمتک کانوا یأمرون الناس بالبر و ینسون أنفسهم و هم یتلون الکتاب أ فلا یعقلون‏
مجموعه ورام، ج‏2، ص: 215

The Messenger of God (may God bless him and his family) said: “On the night I was taken on the Mi‘raj, I passed by a group whose lips were being cut with shears of fire. Each time they were cut, they were restored. I asked Gabriel, ‘Who are these people?’ He replied, ‘They are the preachers of your community. They used to command people to do good, yet forget themselves, even as they recited the Book. Will they not then understand?’”

عن أبی جعفر ع قال شیعتنا ثلاثه أصناف صنف یأکلون الناس بنا و صنف کالزجاج یتهشم و صنف کالذهب الأحمر کلما أدخل النار ازداد جوده.

عن أبی عبد الله ع قال: کان بالمدینه رجل بطال یضحک الناس منه فقال قد أعیانی هذا الرجل أن أضحکه یعنی علی بن الحسین ع قال فمر علی ع و خلفه مولیان له فجاء الرجل حتى انتزع رداءه من رقبته ثم مضى فلم یلتفت إلیه علی ع فاتبعوه و أخذوا الرداء منه فجاءوا به فطرحوه علیه فقال لهم من‏ هذا فقالوا له هذا رجل بطال یضحک أهل المدینه فقال قولوا له إن لله یوما یخسر فیه المبطلون.
الأمالی (للصدوق)، النص، ص: 221

Imam al-Sadiq (AS) said: “Our Shi‘a are of three kinds: one group preys on people in our name; another is like glass, easily shattered; and another is like pure red gold, which grows finer each time it is put into the fire.”

Imam al-Sadiq (AS) said: “There was a man in Medina who was a buffoon and made people laugh. He said, ‘I have never managed to make this man laugh’—meaning ‘Ali ibn al-Husayn (AS). One day ‘Ali (AS) was passing by, with two servants behind him. When the buffoon saw him, he came up, snatched the Imam’s cloak from around his neck, and went off. ‘Ali (AS) paid him no attention. The Imam’s companions pursued the man, took the cloak back, and brought it to him, placing it on his shoulders. He asked them, ‘Who is this?’ They replied, ‘He is a buffoon who makes the people of Medina laugh.’ He said, ‘Tell him that God has a day on which those who engage in falsehood will be the losers.’”

الأمالي (للصدوق) / ترجمه کمره‏اى، متن، ص: 221

Al-‘Atā’iqī relates in his commentary on Nahj al-Balāgha that a man stole the Prophet’s cloak and went out among some people, saying, “This is the cloak of Muhammad (may God bless him). He gave it to me in return for letting me have that woman.” They found this claim outrageous and sent someone to ask the Prophet about it. The man went to drink some water, was bitten by a snake, and died. When the Prophet heard what had happened, he said to ‘Ali, “Go. If you find that he has already been dealt with, burn him in the fire.” ‘Ali went and ordered that he be burned.

Did you find this answer illuminating? Your feedback helps us refine our responses and organize future sessions.
Audio attachment: This question currently has no audio file; the answer is provided in written form, with supporting arguments.

Related questions

Official answers
Question #3100
How can food-based sorcery or magic be nullified?
Critique of Doubts • 31 August 2022
Question #1842
An explanation of the Prophet’s hadith about Lady Fatima’s (SA) tent?
Ahl al-Bayt and Islamic History • 20 August 2022
Question #272
Why is Imam Husayn (AS) known as the son of Sidrat al-Muntaha?
Ahl al-Bayt and Islamic History • 17 July 2022
Question #334
Question #3099
How can we visit the House of God from afar?
Jurisprudence and Rulings • 31 August 2022