Dear Professor, could you please explain this matter? I found it very difficult to understand when I read it. The rites of Hajj have been suspended, visits to the Imams (peace be upon them) and mosques have been closed, and now even the obligatory acts of worship are being affected. Of course, anyone who is ill and for whom fasting would be harmful may break the fast. But what if we think that fasting might increase the likelihood of contracting coronavirus? Does that mean fasting is not obligatory?
Coronavirus is a virus that causes symptoms once it enters the body. Why, then, would fasting make someone more likely to contract it? Perhaps they mean that the immune system becomes weaker? I’m not sure exactly how accurate this claim is. I also tried visiting the address given below the post, but it wouldn’t open. Please share your opinion.
[Forwarded from Moharram Rahmani]
Ayatollah Sanei: “If fasting increases the likelihood of contracting coronavirus, fasting is not obligatory.”
“Regardless of whether doctors or the Ministry of Health have determined that fasting this year could worsen coronavirus or increase the likelihood of contracting it, ‘if a person has reasonable grounds to believe that fasting will worsen an illness or increase the likelihood of becoming ill, fasting is not obligatory for them. In other words, the possibility or fear of harm is sufficient reason not to fast.’ / Shafaqna”